FREE counter and Web statistics from sitetracker.com

OKLAHOMA NESTBOX PROJECT

 

Summary for the 2004 Season

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The Oklahoma Nestbox Trails Project was initiated in 1985 to enhance habitat for cavity-nesting birds in Oklahoma and reverse the population decline noted for the Eastern Bluebird (Sialia sialis).  The project depends entirely upon volunteers to place the boxes in suitable habitat, monitor usage, control competition from House Sparrows, alleviate predation problems and report the nesting season’s results. The Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation’s Wildlife Diversity Program would like to especially give credit to those trail reporters who take the time and have the dedication to establish extensive trails and report on them. 

 

The Wildlife Diversity Program would also like to express our sincere gratitude to the Oklahoma Bluebird Society (OBS) for promoting bluebird conservation in Oklahoma. Thirty percent (15) of the bluebird nestbox reports we received for the 2004 breeding season listed they were affiliated with OBS.  If you wish to learn more about your bluebirds please consider joining this important conservation organization.  They have already made a significant contribution to conservation by encouraging trail monitors to provide us with their data.  The database of the Oklahoma Nestbox Trail Project provides a “window” into the conservation of cavity-nesters- particularly bluebirds- in Oklahoma.  Membership includes receiving their excellent newsletter, The Hole Story, which provides good information about monitoring bluebird nesting activities and habitat enhancement.  Heart-warming stories and poems provided by members will offer inspiration!  A membership form is included in your packet.

 

The staff of the Oklahoma Wildlife Diversity Program wishes to extend our sincerest “thank you” to all trail monitors who know the work, the joy and the frustrations of maintaining a bluebird trail.  Thank you for helping bring back the Eastern Bluebird.

 

 

RESULTS

 

 Distribution map

 

The number of nestbox trail reports received for the 2004 breeding season (51) reflected an increase from the 2003 (44).  Interestingly, the number of nestboxes monitored decreased (767) as compared to 2003 (780).  Twenty-one (21) counties are represented for the 2004 breeding season which is the same as 2003.  Table 1 provides a list of nestbox trail variables from 1994 to 2004.

 

The top four species in frequency of nesting attempts and occurrence on trails were the Eastern Bluebird, House Sparrow, Carolina Chickadee, and the Tufted Titmouse.  Over 99% of nestbox usage was by Eastern Bluebirds and this species was reported on 99% of the trails. 

 

Eleven (1) identified bird species were reported nesting in nestboxes including the first reported nesting of an Ash-throated Flycatcher (Comanche County) that fledged 4 young flycatchers. Nesting attempts by year is provided in Table 2.  In 2004, the House Sparrow was again an unwelcome species on the list.  However, absolutely no chicks fledged out of 135 eggs reported!  Also reported for the third year in a row was a nesting attempt by a European Starling (Comanche County) which laid 1 egg but did not hatch.  This demonstrates how continual monitoring helps to alleviate competition from these non-native species.  Congratulations!

 

As in previous years, not all nesting attempts were monitored throughout the breeding season, and therefore, the number of eggs laid, hatched, and young fledged represent the minimums for the species (Table 3). Monitors reported at least 2,092 Eastern Bluebirds fledged from 614 clutches.  Figure 1 is a map of Oklahoma showing bluebird data by county for the 2004 breeding season.  Included are the number of monitored nestboxes and the number of fledgling bluebirds reported by county.

 

 

  The total number of fledgling bluebirds reported to the Oklahoma Nestbox Trails Project since 1985:49,425.
 

 

 

                                                 TABLE 1.  NESTBOX TRAIL VARIABLES FROM 1994 TO 2004

 

 

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Total Trail Reports

83

53

54

40

52

46

47

47

40

44

51

Total Nestboxes

1401

1173

1108

1081

1142

963

871

797

750

780

767

Average Trail Size

17

17

18

27

22

20

18

15

15

17

15

Number of Counties

33

29

31

24

31

21

24

25

22

21

21

 

 

TABLE 2.  NESTING ATTEMPTS BY YEAR

 

Species

 

1996

 

1997

 

1998

 

1999

 

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

 

Eastern Bluebird

 

1016

 

1072

 

1390

 

1075

 

879

686

690

664

654

 

Carolina Chickadee

 

48

 

59

 

53

 

36

 

47

49

39

40

59

 

House Sparrow

 

134

 

98

 

143

 

118

 

78

90

70

105

89

 

Bewicks Wren

 

20

 

33

 

19

 

8

 

13

6

11

16

17

 

Carolina Wren

 

13

 

14

 

22

 

6

 

12

6

5

11

9

 

House Wren

 

5

 

0

 

6

 

3

 

3

2

1

0

0

 

Tufted Titmouse

 

17

 

41

 

45

 

31

 

71

20

18

40

27

 

White-breasted Nuthatch

 

0

 

0

 

1

 

0

 

1

1

0

0

0

 

Red-bellied Woodpecker

 

1

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

0

0

0

0

 

Great-crested Flycatcher

 

2

 

3

 

5

 

7

 

4

6

5

4

4

 

Tree Swallow

 

1

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

1

0

0

0

0

 

Phoebe

 

1

 

2

 

0

 

0

 

0

0

0

5

2

 

House Finch

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

1

 

0

1

0

0

0

 

Eastern Wood Peewee

 

1

 

1

 

0

 

1

 

1

1

3

0

3

 

European Starling

0

0

0

0

0

1

4

4

1

 

 

                                  TABLE 3. NESTING SUCCESS BY SPECIES IN 2004

 

Species

 

Clutches Monitored

 

Eggs Laid

Total         PC

 

Eggs Hatched

       Total            PC

 

Young Fledged

          Total         PC

 

Eastern Bluebird

641

2676

4.3

2165

3.5

2092

3.4

Carolina Chickadee

55

343

6.2

300

5.4

282

5.1

Tufted Titmouse

26

117

4.5

102

3.9

96

3.7

House Sparrow

41

135

3.3

37

0.9

0

0

Carolina Wren

9

35

3.8

26

2.8

26

2.8

Bewick’s Wren

15

90

6.0

77

5.1

77

5.1

Great Crested Flycatcher

3

15

5.0

6

2.0

6

2.0

PC = per clutch

 

 

 

COMMENTS

 

Following are the comments provided by the trail reporters.  My apologies if your comment is not reflected below.  If I could not interpret handwriting, I did not record your comment.  Thank you so much for taking the time to provide some thoughts, ideas, and concerns:

 

Sparrows broke it up.  (Sequoyah)

 

 

This following comment was incredibly interesting and relates to an article from the California Bluebird Recovery Program, Vol. 10 No. 3, Summer 2004 that I had intended on sharing with our trail monitors.  First the comment:

 

“When titmouse babies fledged, one remained in the house – plastic grass type nesting material had grown around the baby’s right leg.  We cut the plastic but the right leg had not developed a foot – put the baby back in the house anyway.  Checked the house later and the baby was gone.  Several weeks later, a one-legged titmouse showed up on our platform feeder and has since become a regular/ daily visitor.”  (Pawnee)